ABSTRACT
This analysis of the Kyrgyz health system reviews developments in its organization and governance, financing, provision of services, health reforms and health system performance. A mandatory health insurance is in place, with the Mandatory Health Insurance Fund (MHIF) under the Ministry of Health acting as single public payer for almost all hospitals and providers of primary care. The benefits package of publicly covered services is defined in the State-Guaranteed Benefits Programme (SGBP). However, many services require co-payments and in 2019 only 69% of the population was covered by mandatory health insurance. Health expenditure per capita is one of the lowest in the WHO European Region, due to the country's small GDP per capita. Private spending, almost entirely in the form of out-ofpocket expenditure and including informal payments, accounted for 46.3% of health expenditure in 2019. Financial protection is undermined by low levels of public spending for health, resulting in financial hardship for people using health services. While there is a well-developed network of health facilities, the geographical distribution of health workers is uneven and there is an overall shortage of family doctors. Access to health services remains a challenge, which has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. While improvements have been made in recent years, communicable and noncommunicable diseases still pose a major problem and life expectancy prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was one of the lowest in the WHO European Region.
ABSTRACT
Background The rise in extreme heat periods is a major public health challenge of climate change and the World Health Organization therefore recommends the implementation of heat health action plans (HHAPs). In Germany, HHAPs are not implemented in a comprehensive manner nor nationwide. Public health authorities have been identified as key actors with regards to heat and health. This study aims at assessing the role of public health services in the implementation of HHAPs in Germany. Methods First, a review of the scientific and grey literature on the role of public health services in heat adaptation in Europe was conducted. Second, a policy document analysis of the legislation of Germany's federal states for public health services and their potential role in the implementation of HHAPs was carried out. Finally, semi-structured interviews with selected experts from multiple sectors at the local, federal and national level on their perception of the role of public health services in the implementation of HHAPs in Germany were undertaken. Results Preliminary findings show that the legal framework for public health services in the different federal states addresses environmental health and civil protection to varying extents, but that climate change-specific health risks are barely mentioned. The expert interviews revealed perceived barriers for the public health services to implement HHAPs, notably with regards to personnel (e.g. competencies, time), organizational structures (e.g. financial resources, administrative structures, legal mandates) and competing other tasks (e.g. COVID-19 response). Facilitators included motivated individuals, funding opportunities for cross-sectoral collaboration and political support. Conclusions The role of public health services in HHAP implementation in Germany varies widely between the different geographic settings and is influenced by several factors at the individual, organizational and political level. Key messages Public health services can play an important role in heat adaptation, for example through coordinating the implementation of heat health action plans. Strong legal frameworks, sufficient organizational structures and well-trained personnel are important preconditions for an effective response by public health services to climate change challenges.
ABSTRACT
This analysis of the Croatian health system reviews developments in its organization and governance, financing, provision of services, health reforms and health system performance. Croatia has a mandatory social health insurance system with nearly universal population coverage and a generous benefits package. Although per capita spending is low when compared to other EU countries, the share of public spending as a proportion of current health expenditure is high and out-of-pocket payments are low. There are sufficient physical and human resources overall, but some more remote areas, such as the islands off the Adriatic coast and rural areas in central and eastern Croatia, face shortages. While the Croatian health system provides a high degree of financial protection, more can be achieved in terms of improving health outcomes. Several mortality rates are among the highest in the EU, including mortality from cancer, preventable causes (including lung cancer, alcohol-related causes and road traffic deaths) and air pollution. Quality monitoring systems are underdeveloped, but available indicators on quality of care suggest much scope for improvement. Another challenge is waiting times, which were already long in the years before 2020 and are bound to have increased as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.